Obeying the order literally would harm employees; refusing it would not solve the operational problem. The only remaining option was to redesign the timing of the rights.

I saw three obvious choices: defend the legal logic until the executive accepted it, implement the instruction and leave responsibility above me, or withdraw because the requirement was impossible.

The first was unlikely to succeed. The second was unacceptable when I already knew employees could be harmed. The third would leave the workplace with the same unresolved problem.

That left one path: find logic that satisfied all three conditions. Paid leave protects compensation on a day not worked, and each grant has a defined period of validity. Within that framework, some entitlements can be made available earlier, provided the employee is never disadvantaged.

I simulated the grant and use history for every employee and redesigned when entitlements became available. The law remained intact, no employee lost a right, and the visible balance could meet the forty-day demand.

The irony was difficult to ignore. The parent company’s common April 1 rule had grown from the convenience of paper administration. A digital system had to become more complex in order to reproduce a paper-era simplification.

WRITTEN BYYoshio Taki

A systems engineer who loves IBM i / AS/400

CHAPTER 03 · PART 04 · EPISODE 3 / 6 STORIES · 35 STORIES TOTAL

Chapter 3 index · All 35 stories